![]() Always use the specified cards with this camera.Do not touch the metallic parts of the card directly.Slide the battery lock knob in the Battery lock knob direction of the arrow to unlock, and then remove the battery.ģ Insert the card straight until it clicks into place.Be sure to insert it in the correct direction. If you insert the battery in the wrong direction, the camera is not turned on.Insert the battery as illustrated with the Θ mark toward the battery lock knob.The fact that there really is hardly anything in it - and that I actually prefer the files that are coming out of OV3 - speaks volumes for the manufacturer's software.2 Insert the battery while sliding the battery lock knob in the direction of the arrow. #Olympus viewer 3 update softwareI wanted to see if Viewer 3 - the FREE software supplied with my camera - was a worthy consideration when placed up against the industry standard Adobe Lightroom. I would also finish this off by reiterating the whole purpose of this comparison. ![]() So the OV3/Tiff/Photoshop workflow makes a lot of sense to me personally. Once I have the Tiff, I'm going to do final edits in something else anyway. I only ever do very basic edits to my RAW files before saving it out to a Tiff or jpeg, so the controls available from OV3 also suit my needs perfectly. A sharpened, colourful, noise free Tiff suits me just fine. I rarely spend more than 5 minutes editing any image, and that includes cropping. I've always been the kind of photographer who tries as much as possible to get it 'right' in camera. But 99% of the time it's what I want my photos to end up looking like anyway. What's wrong with starting with sharpened, noise-reduced, colourful, contrasty Tiffs from your RAW processor? I know I can always dial down all these settings if I need to. So given that a simple 'flattening' of the OV3 Tiff file is all it takes to bring it in-line with Lightroom CC - but that I find the colours more pleasing from Olympus Viewer 3 - then I still think it's a win for Olympus.īesides - this all assumes that I want my Tiffs to start out looking like Lightroom's slightly flatter conversion. I think it's a truer representation of what I was actually seeing when I took the photograph. I happen to prefer the way OV3 renders the colour from the RAW file. With most settings dialed down to their lowest (-2) in Olympus Viewer 3, Lightroom CC and OV3 Tiffs are very close - except for their colour rendition. And it's the above sunset shot comparison that is still the most telling (for me at least). Lightroom CC on right, Olympus Viewer 3 on left.īut at the end of the day, it's still the colour rendition from OV3 that stands out the most. I like to think that it's the later of the two? Noise is still cleaner compared to Lightroom CC's conversion, so either Olympus are ramping up Noise Reduction regardless of what you set as the user - or they really do have the secret to their own 'special sauce' contained within the. The other difference that still remains between the two is the noise - or at least the lack of it in the Olympus Viewer 3 generated Tiff. Once again, it looks slightly 'truer' to my eyes. But I have to say that I still prefer the Olympus colour rendition. Contrast and Saturation are also now about the same. In fact, I'd say that now the Lightroom Tiff is maybe just a 'hair' sharper - maybe. So what's the verdict now? Well, on the sharpness front, things have definitely evened out by setting OV3 to -2 Sharpness. Lightroom CC on right, Olympus Viewer 3 on the left. So I decided to repeat the comparison, but this time I dialed in -2 Sharpness, -2 Contrast, -2 Saturation, and set the Noise Reduction to 'OFF' (from 'As Shot' - even though NR in the camera is, in fact, set to 'OFF'). orf RAW file, even at the '0' or Off settings. It would appear that the software developers for OV3 want to make sure you get these same results when outputting from an. Olympus's jpegs are praised by many as being some of the best out-of-camera jpegs in the industry. ![]() ![]() It appears that Olympus are applying a decent amount of sharpening and noise reduction to the file once it's output - even if the software settings are all set to '0' or Off. Since my last post on the comparison between Olympus Viewer 3 and Lightroom CC, I've done a little more research into OV3 (Olympus Viewer 3). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |